Notify me of new HIR pieces! | |
The Oslo
War
Process Historical and Investigative Research, 29
Oct 2005
intro |
1 |
2
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 3. Knut
Vollebaek helps US Intelligence prepare the ground for war The NATO bombing of Serbia began on March 24, 1999, shortly after the Racak ‘massacre’ hoax exploded onto the headlines. The Norwegian foreign minister Knut Vollebaek, also Chairman in Office of the OSCE (Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe), played a prominent role in this. Vollebaek assisted NATO’s gunboat diplomacy to keep William Walker -- who engineered the Racak ‘massacre’ hoax -- in Kosovo against the wishes of the Yugoslav government. He also assisted NATO’s gunboat diplomacy to compel Slobodan Milosevic to sign the Rambouillet so-called "Agreement." The next section will deal with Rambouillet. Here I examine Vollebaek's efforts to keep William Walker in Kosovo, which efforts were closely coordinated with Washington. As reported in the Sunday Times of London,[15] the Yugoslav government, like European diplomats in Belgrade, became understandably suspicious of William Walker because of his background. These suspicions appeared confirmed when Walker rushed -- prior to any investigation -- to declare the Racak incident a ‘massacre’ against Albanian ‘civilians’ by the Serbian security forces. So the government in Belgrade ordered Walker to leave. After a flurry of gunboat diplomacy in which president Slobodan Milosevic was told to either back off or get bombed, the expulsion order against Walker was "frozen." The following is from the Chicago Sun-Times:
Albright’s meaning between the lines becomes very clear: if Walker was kicked out, she said, she would pull the entire OSCE team out, she would declare a collapse of the cease-fire, and then she would start bombing, because "the end of the tottering cease-fire between Milosevic's forces and ethnic Albanian separatists" would give her the excuse she needed to begin "NATO air strikes against Yugoslavia." Translation: "Make my day." Madeleine Albright’s threat to remove the entire 750-person OSCE monitoring team deserves close attention, because she was the US Secretary of State, not the Chairman in Office of the OSCE. That title, as we know, was held by Knut Vollebaek. The website of the OSCE explains the role of the OSCE chairman as follows:
So the Chairman in Office is the executive -- which is to say, the boss -- of the OSCE. The American OSCE delegation was about 130 people (as Walker is quoted saying in the Sunday Times of London [18]). Therefore, assuming Albright had the formal authority to say anything to anybody in the OSCE, at most she could not have been giving orders to more than 130 people. What she certainly didn't have was the authority to command the entire 750-person OSCE monitoring team, composed of people from all member states and under the authority of the OSCE's boss: Knut Vollebaek. Not only that. In addition, Knut Vollebaek had a reasonable constituency for acting independently from Albright because the OSCE missions from other countries were upset with the behavior of the American mission.[19] So what are we to make of the fact that Albright was brazenly confident that threats to remove the entire OSCE mission were hers to make? That Knut Vollebaek and Madeleine Albright were both cogs in the same machine. But Vollebaek was much more than a mere cog. He was dispatched as an agent of Empire to the frontline, to carry out himself the bullying of Milosevic:
Isn't this absurd? The Yugoslav government was complaining entirely about one person whom it considered biased and suspect, and this person was supposed to be a diplomat acting as a ‘peace-verifier.’ If the Yugoslavs objected to this ‘diplomat,’ what was the easy and diplomatic thing to do? Replace him with somebody else! It hardly makes any sense for NATO, a defensive alliance, to send the Chairman in Office of a different body, and moreover one calling itself the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, to threaten war. It makes even less sense to do all this over the visa status of one individual. Unless, of course, Norwegian diplomats are NATO puppets and NATO was just looking for an excuse to attack. Much else that would otherwise be absurd becomes easily comprehensible under the light of that hypothesis. For example, consider Knut Vollebaek's reasoning:
On the face of it this is perfectly absurd. First, whatever deaths were being sustained at the time were NATO’s fault because NATO had forced the Yugoslav army to retrench so that the already defeated KLA terrorists could regain territory; Second, what Vollebaek referred to as the ongoing "humanitarian catastrophe" was, according to Liberty,[21] a grand total of less than 70 dead since the OSCE mission had arrived. Any plane crash will easily top that. Third, these were almost certainly all combatants, not civilians. However, underneath the incomprehensible official story there is another story that perfectly explains NATO’s behavior. Walker had a very important covert role to play: he was in Kosovo to engineer the Racak hoax (which would provide a pretext for war), and also to fan out his CIA personnel for the purpose of training the terrorist KLA and establishing the necessary communication links in advance of the foreordained bombing of Serbia. The flurry of desperate bullying and diplomacy to keep Walker in Kosovo makes clear that he was the critical mastermind for the entire operation. And Albright’s prominent role in the frantic efforts to keep Walker in Kosovo are consistent with her full and complete understanding of Walker’s mission’s true purpose. The same goes for Knut Vollebaek, whose behavior makes sense only if we assume that he understood perfectly the desperate importance of keeping Walker on the ground until his crucial offensive mission had been accomplished. And Vollebaek worked hard at this. After obtaining the "freeze" on Walker’s expulsion order, he went the extra mile for NATO. The following is from The Daily Telegraph:
Where two US envoys had failed, the seemingly neutral Norse who appeared to represent the so-called "international community" succeeded not only in keeping Walker in Kosovo, but in getting the Yugoslav army to retreat further and allow William Walker’s personnel -- most of them CIA operatives or else employees of the CIA-linked paramilitary companies Military Professional Resources and Dyncorp, as we have seen -- the ability to "move freely about the province." Vollebaek was preparing the ground for the bombing of Yugoslavia, which he obviously knew was foreordained. Further evidence that Vollebaek knew long in advance that -- come what may -- NATO was resolved to bomb Yugoslavia can be gleaned from his subsequent diplomacy with regard to the Rambouillet so-called ‘peace agreement.’ I turn to this next. Continue to
part 4:
Footnotes and Further
Reading [15] 'Sunday Times' (London), 12 March 2000 "CIA Aided Kosovo Guerrilla Army" by Tom Walker and Aidan Laverty [16] Chicago Sun-Times, January 22, 1999, FRIDAY, Late Sports Final Edition, NEWS; Pg. 34, 511 words, Milosevic: Envoy can stay; Planned expulsion of U.S. diplomat 'frozen', BELGRADE, Yugoslavia [17]
The quote in the main text comes from an OSCE page
that has now been removed, but I found it in Google cache and you may
view it here: What the OSCE website now says is the following:
It is interesting that the word "executive" has been removed from the description of the Chairman in Office. But the CiO is still the executive, as is obvious from the above description, and as is required by the fact that the documents establishing the OSCE were not altered in the period between the two webpages. [18] 'Sunday Times' (London), 12 March 2000 "CIA Aided Kosovo Guerrilla Army" by Tom Walker and Aidan Laverty [19]
"European diplomats then working for the OSCE
claim it was betrayed by an American policy that made airstrikes
inevitable. Some have questioned the motives and loyalties of William
Walker, the American OSCE head of mission.
[20] The New York Times, January 23, 1999, Saturday, Late Edition - Final, Section A; Page 4; Column 1; Foreign Desk, 886 words, Force Possible If Milosevic Stays Defiant, West Warns, By STEVEN ERLANGER, PRISTINA, Serbia, Jan. 22 [21]
Liberty, July
1999: Inquiry: How Muderous Are the Serbs? By David Ramsay Steele. [22] THE DAILY TELEGRAPH, January 23, 1999, Saturday, FULLPAGE, WORLD; Pg. 19, 458 words, Buying time in Kosovo / Pullback averts airstrikes, MICHAEL RODDY |
MORE HIR ARTICLES ON: |