Notify me of new HIR pieces! | |
The Oslo
War
Process Historical and Investigative Research, 29
Oct 2005
intro |
1 |
2
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 This piece will argue that Norwegian "peacekeeping" diplomacy is in reality designed to advance the imperial aims of the NATO powers by giving moral cover to terrorist groups that attack countries NATO would like to see undermined or destroyed. In order to make my case, I will trace the activities of former Norwegian Foreign Minister Knut Vollebaek, who played a key role in the attack against the Serbs, assisting US and European imperial objectives. This case is chock-full of lessons for those who would understand what is happening to Israel, Sri Lanka, and Spain.
The
Table of Contents
follows the Introduction. Introduction Norwegian diplomats helped design and facilitate the famous Oslo 'Peace' Process that brought the PLO closer than ever to its Israeli civilian targets, by making it the government over the West Bank and Gaza Arabs. The only reason this happened is that the United States government strong-armed the Israelis to participate.[1] Without this, the PLO would not have become the government over the West Bank and Gaza Arabs because at the time the PLO was a defeated and essentially irrelevant organization, exiled in Tunis, from which position it was finding it quite difficult to murder Israelis.[2] But the Oslo Process revived this terrorist organization, which then made the Second Intifada, whose violence continues, possible.[3]
Israelis largely do not understand how
the US-Norwegian team has been destroying their country for two main
reasons. First, Israelis (and Jews more generally) tend to believe the constant refrain
from US officials that the US supposedly conducts its foreign policy to
benefit Israel. Repetition really does have an effect on the mind, but Those who would understand what is happening to Israel would do well to study the case of Yugoslavia, for the attack on the Serbs follows a pattern that, in its main outlines, is very much like the US-Norwegian effort against Israel. This piece will explain how the US-Norwegian binary destroyed Serbian resistance by focusing on Knut Vollebaek, Norway's top diplomat at the time, and NATO's forward weapon. Consider the following sequence of events. The Serbian government was fighting a terrorist movement in Kosovo: the KLA (Kosovo Liberation Army), which threatened the lives of both Serbs and Albanians living there. And yet, as if the Serbian government had been the one victimizing civilians rather than protecting them from terrorists,
The above required close coordination between US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright and Knut Vollebaek, the Chairman in Office of the OSCE and also Norway's foreign minister. Knut Vollebaek's role was prominent, and he lent a phony veneer of "international respectability" to NATO’s attack. To see how this works, suffice it to observe the manner in which the British daily The Guardian (hardly an exception) referred to the deployment of OSCE observers in Kosovo:
But "the international community" was not doing anything. It was the OSCE, led by a cog in NATO's machine, the Norwegian foreign minister Knut Vollebaek, that was sending observers into Kosovo -- and at the point of a NATO gun, because the Serbs had been threatened with bombs if they didn't accept. Nobody would notice, though, because the newspapers rushed to bless the "international community's" deployment of "peace monitors" (who's against peace and community?), and Knut Vollebaek's Norwegian identity produced the needed aura of benevolence, because in a sense he led the process, diplomatically. This manufactured veneer of supposed international consensus was crucial in convincing the public that the Serbs had to be bombed, because in fact this bombing was never approved by the UN Security Council, and therefore was illegal. The US-Norwegian binary produces similar foreign policy elsewhere -- it is quite consistent. In addition to empowering the terrorist KLA in Yugoslavia and the terrorist PLO in Israel, Norwegian diplomats have created the so-called Sri Lankan "Peace" Process, which, as in the other two cases, has brought a great deal of suffering to that country by empowering the LTTE (Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam), or Tamil Tigers, arguably the worst terrorist group in the world. And Norwegian diplomats have been hard at work trying to produce a peace process that will reward ETA, the Basque terrorist movement. More than a trifecta: wherever Norwegian diplomats get involved, the terrorists come out winning big. Since the Sri Lankan process is a Vollebaek creation, this piece will end with a short analysis of that situation and the dangers to India therein. Soon, this website will publish Benjamin Klein's much more in-depth and detailed analysis of the Norwegian intervention in Sri Lanka. Below you may consult a Table of Contents for this article, or you may proceed directly to Part 1. »» Continue to
Part 1:
Table of Contents
________________________________________________________
Footnotes and Further
Reading [1]
In 1991, Bush
Sr.’s administration forced Israel to
participate in the Oslo process, which brought
the PLO into the West Bank and Gaza”; From “Is
the US an Ally of Israel?”; Historical and
Investigative Research; by Francisco Gil-White. [2] In
1982-83, the US military rushed into Lebanon to protect the PLO from
the Israelis; From “Is
the US an Ally of Israel?”; Historical and
Investigative Research; by Francisco Gil-White. [3]
In 1994, Yasser Arafat was given a Nobel Peace
Prize, and the CIA trained the PLO, even though Arafat's henchmen were
saying in public, this very year, that they would use their training to
oppress Arabs and kill Jews;
From “Is
the US an Ally of Israel?”; Historical and
Investigative Research; by Francisco Gil-White. [4]
“Is the US an Ally of Israel?”;
Historical and Investigative Research; by Francisco Gil-White. [4a] In February 1998, US special envoy to the Balkans Robert Gelbard had already recognized publicly that the KLA was a terrorist organization:
And yet later the same year, on 4 December 1998, the British daily The Guardian told the public the 'bad guys' were the Yugoslavs, when it explained to its readers that “'Albanian terrorists' [is] Belgrade's term for the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA),” as if there were any question about what kind of organization the KLA was. There wasn't. Following that, the Guardian explained:
But the OSCE was already there:
What was the consequence? This:
Knut Vollebaek was brought in to make the OSCE maximally effective for NATO's bullying of the Serbs:
SOURCE: Border clash results in KLA deaths, The Guardian (London), December 4, 1998, The Guardian Foreign Page; Pg. 20, 319 words, Chris Bird in Belgrade. [5]
"The Road to Jenin: The Racak “massacre” hoax, and
those whose honesty it places in doubt: Helena Ranta, NATO, the UN, The
New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, The Associated Press, and
Human Rights Watch"; Historical and Investigative Research; 16 April
2003; by Francisco Gil-White [6] Border clash results in KLA deaths, The Guardian (London), December 4, 1998, The Guardian Foreign Page; Pg. 20, 319 words, Chris Bird in Belgrade. |
MORE HIR ARTICLES ON: |