|
|||||||||||
________________________________________________________ 7. Why do people say that ‘the Jews’
control the media? They don’t. Table
of Contents < Introduction < General
Electric -- not controlled by Jews < Time-Warner
-- not controlled by Jews < Rupert
Murdoch's empire -- not controlled by Jews < Who controls the media? < Edgar Bronfman Jr.'s failed attempt to control Universal, and the
lessons therein < Final
remarks Introduction Before WWII, the Nazis and their sympathizers made
popular all over the world the allegation that ‘the Jews’ controlled
everything in secret, including the mass media, and that they would use this
clandestine power to hurt us all. The accusations were widely believed
because they were built on a long tradition of Western accusations against
the Jews going back to the first century, when they were accused of killing
God: a cultural inertia (see Part 1).
The Nazi accusations of the supposed clandestine total power of ‘the Jews,’
plus supposed evil intent of the same, produced a pan-Western anti-Jewish
hysteria that fueled the genocide of more than 5 million Jews, which repeated
the consequences of similar accusations in previous centuries in the West
(see Part 1).
We are back where we started. It is almost impossible to be both alive and in
the West and not have heard the allegation that “the Jews control the media.”
As before, the accusation is a lie. This piece will demonstrate that most of
the big media is not controlled by ‘the Jews,’ and that when people claiming
a Jewish identity do own a big media company, this company will be
especially careful to take an anti-Jewish slant. Where to start? Let’s take a look at General Electric, one of the
greatest media powerhouses.
This is a publicly traded company, so it is owned by
the stockholders, not by ‘the Jews.’ In any case, companies are run by their
CEO’s. The CEO (Chief Executive Officer) of this company for many years was
Jack Welch who, as The New Yorker informs me, is “the grandson of
Irish immigrants… [H]is mother, Grace, [was] a strict Roman Catholic…”[1] And this
religious orientation apparently lingered, because the Toronto Star
says that “Welch [is] a devout Catholic.”[2] Whatever
else that means, it certainly means that Welch is not Jewish. The current CEO at General Electric is one Jeffrey
Immelt, whose last name is German. USA Today reports that he is a
“Presbyterian.”[3] Whatever else that means, it means that Jeffrey Immelt
is not Jewish. This is already a lot of media that is -- and has
been -- controlled by non-Jews. General Electric owns NBC/Universal Television
Studio, and NBC/Universal Television and Universal Pictures, and 30% of
Paxson Communications. It also owns the following NBC stations: WNBC (New
York), KNBC (Los Angeles), WMAQ (Chicago), WCAU (Philadelphia), KNTV (San
Jose/San Francisco), KXAS (Dallas/Fort Worth), WRC (Washington), WTVJ
(Miami), KNSD (San Diego), WVIT (Hartford), WNCN (Raleigh), WCMH (Columbus),
WVTM (Birmingham), WJAR (Providence). In addition, GE owns the following: Telemundo
Stations: KVEA/KWHY (Los Angeles), WNJU (New York), WSCV (Miami), KTMD
(Houston), WSNS (Chicago), KXTX (Dallas/Fort Worth), KVDA (San Antonio), KSTS
(San Jose/San Francisco), KDRX (Phoenix), KNSO (Fresno), KMAS (Denver), WNEU
(Boston/Merrimack), KHRR (Tucson), and WKAQ (Puerto Rico). And, finally, GE owns the following channels: CNBC,
MSNBC, Bravo, Mun2TV, Sci-Fi, Trio, and USA.[4] That’s a lot of media. And yet, compared to
Time-Warner, General Electric is not such a big media empire.
This company used to be called AOL-Time-Warner back
when AOL was still an admired company. In January 2003 the Washington Post
reported as follows: “The
announcement Sunday that Steve Case will yield the company chairmanship in
May leaves [Richard D.] Parsons alone at the top of the world’s largest media
company [Time-Warner].”[10] The notice for Parsons’ mother’s death, in the New
York Times, states that “A funeral service will be held on Friday,
January 16. at 10am at New Hope Lutheran Church.”[11] Whatever
else that means, it means that Richard D. Parsons is not Jewish. So “the
world’s largest media company” is run by a non-Jew. Steve Case, the man who ran AOL-Time-Warner before
Parsons got the job, celebrated mass at San Francisco’s Grace Cathedral after
his brother Dan died.[12] Whatever else that means, it means that Steve Case is
not Jewish. It is true that the CEO at Time-Warner in the period
1992 to 2002 was Gerald Levin, who is Jewish. But that’s over now. And it is
worth pointing out that during Levin’s tenure Time-Warner did not have a
pro-Jewish line. On the contrary. Consider only that CNN was acquired by
Time-Warner in 1996, during Levin’s tenure, and CNN is Time-Warner’s major TV
news operation. Vincent Cannistraro, incessant enemy of Israel, was appearing
regularly on CNN when Levin acquired it (more than once a month in 1994).[13] But after
CNN became part of Time-Warner, CNN did not expose Cannistraro as a terrorist
-- on the contrary, he continued to appear on CNN as a trusty counter-terrorism
‘expert.’ And in 2001, with Gerald Levin still presiding as CEO, CNN’s Wolf
Blitzer referred to Vincent Cannistraro’s Washington Post editorial (which defends the human rights
of those who murder innocent Israeli children)
in order to make his own anti-Israel attack.[14]
Moving on, I have heard it said that Rupert Murdoch
is supposedly Jewish, but this is because “Murdoch’s mother is frequently
mis-reported to be Jewish -- although this is not the case.”[15] Now, if
Murdoch’s mother is not Jewish, I wonder why she is “frequently mis-reported
to be Jewish…”? Could it have anything to do with the fact that Rupert
Murdoch presides over “one of the world’s largest and most influential media
corporations”? In any case, as the same source informs me, “Rupert’s father
was the son of a Presbyterian minister from Scotland.” Whatever else that
means, it means that Rupert Murdoch is not Jewish. As in the case of Murdoch’s mother, Murdoch’s media
is also frequently mis-reported to be pro-Jewish. To see that this is false,
consider only that FOX TV is part of Murdoch’s media empire. This TV company
has had Vincent Cannistraro as an interview guest, dressing him up as a
‘counter-terrorism’ expert,[16] and it has used him as a supposedly authoritative
source on multiple occasions.[17] It has also
interviewed Raymond McGovern as a representative of Veteran Intelligence
Professionals for Sanity (VIPS).[18] Does FOX TV have a pro-Israel bent, as has been
alleged? I have a pro-Israel bent, which is why I have taken the
trouble to document whether or not Vincent Cannistraro and Ray McGovern, who are prominently
on display attacking Israel, can be believed.
Why doesn’t FOX TV do this? It is incredibly easy to do. If FOX TV is really
competing with the other media outlets, and if they are pro-Israel, why
aren’t they demonstrating to their viewers that one cannot trust Vincent
Cannistraro and Raymond McGovern, prominent enemies of Israel? This would
simultaneously advance FOX’s supposedly pro-Israel bent and would demonstrate
the inferiority of their media competition, which has been pushing
Cannistraro and McGovern as ‘experts’ you can trust (see here,
and here).
Instead, FOX TV helps burnish Cannistraro’s and McGovern’s images as supposed
‘experts,’ like everybody else.
Many Jews are employed in the mass media, and they
are overrepresented. Jews are overrepresented in all the professions,
because they have always been the literate culture par excellence, and
whenever given the opportunities they do their best to get a quality
education. But, as the above documentation makes clear, ‘the Jews’ obviously
don’t control the mass media. Let us now examine the opposite hypothesis to
the one underlying the claim that the media is controlled by ‘the Jews.’ This
would be the hypothesis that the antisemites are the ones everywhere
in power. Is this a reasonable view? Well, what predictions does it make? I
can think of two predictions that are relatively straightforward. Prediction 1. A media
company that defends the Jews will not be allowed to prosper. Evidence: Israel
National Radio has indeed been persecuted for no better reason than
that it defends Israel, opposing the Oslo so-called ‘peace’ process that
revived the PLO when it had already been defeated, and which has contributed
to so many innocent deaths in Israel. You may read about that here:
Corollary. A media
company owned or controlled by Jews that does prosper will have to be
an ‘exception that proves the rule.’ It will be an exception in that
the company really will be owned or controlled by ethnic Jews (most big media
companies aren’t), but it will prove the rule by attacking the Jews as
loudly -- or perhaps more loudly -- than the rest of the big media. Why?
Because otherwise the antisemites in power will not allow such a media
company to prosper, as per the first prediction, above. Evidence: Let us take a
look at the performance of the The New York Times and The
Washington Post during the Holocaust, because both are big media
companies that have been Jewish-owned, and because the Holocaust simply had
to be opposed -- it was not a morally ambiguous issue. The following is
from Kenneth Levin's The Oslo Syndrome: “The failure
of most media outlets to give prominent coverage to news related to the
Nazis' campaign of extermination compromised efforts to increase public
awareness and rally support for rescue, and prominent Jewish-owned news
outlets shared in this failure. The New York Times, in the years
before the war, had already established a pattern of limiting discussion of
the Nazis' depredations of the Jews. When, shortly after Hitler's ascension
to power, the paper was challenged to open its letter columns to the plight
of Germany's Jews, publisher Adolph Ochs refused. He explained that to do so
would generate too much mail and would require, under Times rules,
that he give equal space to the other side. (Almost two decades earlier, in
1915, Ochs had warned an editor against giving too prominent coverage to an
American Jewish Committee campaign for aid to Jewish civilian populations
that were enduring particular hardship in eastern European war zones. The
publisher suggested that the campaign was too parochial.) When news of the
mass killing began to emerge, the Times consistently buried the story.
The revelation by Rabbi Wise in November, 1942, of two million Jews murdered
was reported on page 10, next to an article about a truck hijacking in New
Jersey. People who
have worked for and written about the Times have spoken of
management's not wanting the Times to appear to be concerned with
Jewish issues or to be thought of as a Jewish paper. But this explanation for
the paper's subdued coverage of the plight of Europe's Jews is not simply a
retrospective one; the nature of the Times' coverage, and the
explanation for it, were perceived similarly by many people then. For
example, Deborah Lipstadt writes that a resolution by 500 Christian ministers
and laymen donouncing the 'systematic Nazi destruction of the Jewish people'
was given only a few lines by the Times and buried in page 7, and a
similar event was reported on page 17. Villard blamed the paper's
'unfortunate trait' of not wanting to appear 'a vigorous defender' of the
Jews. ...The Washington
Post, also a Jewish-owned paper in a position to influence the level of
public awareness and attention, likewise gave little prominence to coverage
of the genocide. Moreover, publisher Eugene Meyer strongly objected to calls
for rescue. The paper ran a four-part front page series -- much higher
profile than it gave any Holocaust story -- attacking the Bergson group
[which was pushing for a rescue effort]; a series that it subsequently had to
retract because of inaccuracies. In addition, Meyer wrote a letter to the
U.S. solicitor general accusing those promoting rescue of harassing the
president, and concluded that he felt it is not 'necessary for any pressure
group, however well meaning, to devote its time and money to the business of
'molding American opinion' on this subject.”[9] The above suggests that ‘the Jews’ do not even
control the media that is owned by individual Jews. This is consistent with
the Jews being an oppressed people, which is of course the opposite of a
conspiracy holding the reins of world power (and it fits the pattern, doesn’t
it, of the last 2000 years, in which there has been one anti-Jewish massacre
after another, with relentless regularity, and often mobilized by the
accusation that the Jews are supposed to be a secret conspiracy in power!;
see Part 1). Prediction 2. The real powerbrokers
should discriminate against Jews in the buying and selling of big media. Evidence: Edgar
Bronfman's difficulties in becoming a media mogul, which I examine below.
As mentioned above, these days GE owns Universal.
But Edgar Bronfman Jr. wanted to buy it himself and tried to. We shall
examine this because Bronfman is Jewish and the details of his failed
bid for Universal are quite instructive. The Los Angeles Times explains that “Edgar
Bronfman Jr. wanted to be a media mogul,” and so badly that he “orchestrated
the sale of his family’s company [Seagram]...to finance his dream of a global
media empire built around Universal Studios….”[5] To see what Bronfman was
willing to risk to become a media mogul, consider only that “the expensive
Hollywood gamble cost the Bronfmans Universal, their liquor business, and a
good portion of their multibillion-dollar fortune.” But despite Bronfman’s unrivaled passion to become a
media mogul, it was simply not to be. After buying Universal from gentiles
(Matsushita, a Japanese company), he had to sell it to Vivendi, also run by
gentiles, less than a year later, holding it for about as long as a rugby
player holds a ball. When he tried to get Universal back, no matter what he
offered, Bronfman couldn’t, as we shall see. It was Jean-Marie Messier who presided as CEO of
Vivendi when this company acquired Universal from Edgar Bronfman. This
Messier had been buying up a lot of stuff, and lots of articles have been
written to explain the troubles at Vivendi as resulting from Messier’s
“acquisition spree,” which overextended the company. But in a Slate
article dated 6 August 2003 Messier himself alleged that Vivendi-Universal
didn’t work out for a different reason: “According to Messier, the clannish
Jews in Hollywood had it in for the gentile [i.e. non-Jewish] Frenchman.”[6] Whatever
else that means, it means that Jean-Marie Messier is not Jewish. And Messier was replaced in 2002 by Jean-Rene
Fourtou, whose name appears to indicate that he isn't Jewish either. Now, the current CEO of Vivendi is
Jean-Bernard Lévy, whose name does appear Jewish. However, it turns out that
the man who really calls the shots, anyway, as the New York Times
explained in 2003, is Claude Bébéar, who is considered by many “a sinister
‘godfather’ of old-style crony capitalism” and who is described as “a
practicing Roman Catholic.”[7] Whatever else that means, it means that Claude Bébéar
is not Jewish. Bébéar has so much power that he decides who
gets to be CEO at Vivendi, as the New York Times explained in the same
article: “In 1991,
[Bébéar] stormed the United States with a $1 billion investment in the
Equitable Life Assurance group, a business he later turned into an AXA unit.
That gave him credibility in international finance and helped him install Mr.
Fourtou last year as Vivendi’s chairman, to replace Jean-Marie Messier, who
was ousted after Vivendi was crushed by debt from an acquisition spree that
involved big American deals.” Now, for the Bronfman drama. Three years after selling his beloved media empire
to Vivendi, Edgar Bronfman Jr. put together “a desperate bid to regain
Universal” when Vivendi, chafing under Messier's “acquisition spree,”
announced that it would sell Universal. Other competitors backed out when
Bronfman outbid them all. But despite all this, the man whom “practicing
Catholic” Claude Bébéar installed at Vivendi to correct Messier's
“acquisition spree,” Jean-Rene Fourtou, still sold Universal to
somebody else: to non-Jews: to General Electric. As reported in the Los Angeles Times: “[Bronfman]
cast himself in the self-described role of ‘lion tamer’ to a group of unruly
private investors, pulling them together long enough to tender a $13-billion
bid to buy back his Universal empire. . . .by September, when Vivendi
chairman Jean-Rene Fourtou promised to name a winner, it looked as though Bronfman
might have triumphed. Up to that point, every Hollywood high-roller...had
dropped out of the bidding for Universal. . . Their reasons were simple:
Vivendi wanted too much money. But Bronfman.
. .had a score to settle, as well as a fundamental belief in Universal’s
intrinsic value. The studio might not currently be worth the $14 billion
Vivendi was demanding, but Bronfman thought the asking price was close enough
that he meant to stay in the game to the end. Then, on the
morning after Labor Day, when Bronfman prepared to bask in the limelight as
the once and future mayor of Universal City, Vivendi’s Fourtou announced the
$14-billion NBC deal [that is, with NBC's parent company, General Electric].”[8] This is very clear. If “Bronfman. . .had a score to settle. . .[and]. .
.meant to stay in the game to the end,” it was obviously easier to wring an
extra billion or two from Bronfman than from anybody else. He was passionate
about getting the company back and would have gone higher if asked to. But he
was not asked to! Vivendi sold Universal to GE even though GE offered not
one penny more than Vivendi’s asking price. So this may be considered evidence for how rich
gentiles discriminate against rich Jews in the buying and selling of big
media; it is certainly not evidence that ‘the Jews’ control the media. And once again: If Bronfman had been allowed
to create the Universal media empire he so lusted after, his media would have
almost certainly attacked the Jews. Consider only that Edgar Bronfman Sr.,
the man’s father, from his perch atop the World Jewish Congress, has behaved
in some ways as a high-profile anti-Israel operative. In the early years of
the Reagan administration, Edgar Bronfman Sr. lent his name to various
diplomatic attacks against Israel, and in 1985 he was the leader of an
attempt to maneuver behind Israel’s back and saddle it with a terrorist PLO
state next door. Bronfman is a citizen of the US, not Israel, and Israeli
patriots repudiated him.[9a] But that was mild. This is how far Bronfman Sr. has
gone to attack the Jews:
What Bronfman Sr.’s performance suggests is that
what is true for Jewish-owned media in an antisemitic universe will be true
for powerful Jews in general, whether or not they are media moguls: the
reason they have been allowed to become powerful is that they do not defend
the Jews, and on the contrary appear to take pleasure in attacking them. This
is not speculation, and interested readers may consult the following HIR
investigation on the behavior of a wide cross-section of Diaspora Jewish
leaders.
Now, this is strictly for fun, but let me point
something out. When we do find Jews among the powerful media
controllers, they don’t defend the Jewish people at all. But we don’t
find that many. What we find is a rather large number of powerful news media
controllers who are Christian: Jack Welch, Catholic; the mighty
godfather who really calls the shots at Vivendi (and at many other places),
Claude Bébéar, another Catholic; and Steve Case, who’s also Catholic. Then we
have Jeffrey Immelt, Presbyterian; and Rupert Murdoch, another Presbyterian. Richard
D. Parsons is a Lutheran. All Christians!
It is a historical fact that the Christian gospels
slander ‘the Jews’ with the false accusation that they killed God (see Part 1 of this series). It is a historical fact that Christians have long
persecuted Jews in the West (see Part
1 of this series). And it is a fact documented in
this series that the media is anti-Jewish (see Parts
2 through 5).
Finally, we have seen that the US government acquiesces in the media attacks
against Israel when it could easily counter them (see Part 6 of
this series). And yet, somehow, the rumor is not about a Christian conspiracy
to attack the Jewish people -- despite the fact that, as you now clearly see,
‘the Christians’ control the mass media. Curious, isn’t it? The whole thing
reminds me of a saying from The Wizard of Oz: “Pay no attention to the
man behind that curtain. . .!”
Footnotes and Further Reading [1] The New Yorker, October 1, 2001, THE CRITICS; Books;
Pg. 112, 2389 words, GUT PUNCH; How great was Jack Welch?, JOHN CASSIDY [2] Finding cracks in the brand that Jack built, Toronto
Star, March 15, 2002 Friday, Ontario Edition, BUSINESS;, Pg. C01, 1916 words,
ANDREW STAWICKI/TORONTO STAR FILE PHOTO [3] GE enters new era as a legend leaves, USA TODAY,
September 7, 2001, Friday,, FINAL EDITION, MONEY;, Pg. 1B, 1860 words, Del
Jones, NEW YORK [4] “WHO OWNS WHAT?; General Electric”; Columbia Journalism
Review. [5] Los Angeles Times, November 16, 2003 Sunday, Home
Edition, Page 14, 4833 words, Cover Story; Fumbling the Franchise; Edgar
Bronfman Jr. Wanted to Be a Media Mogul. That Dream Cost Him Billions, as
Well as the Canadian Liquor Empire His Grandfather Built. Guess What? He
Still Wants to Be a Media Mogul., Dennis McDougal, Dennis McDougal is the
author of "The Last Mogul: Lew Wasserman,, MCA and the Hidden History of
Hollywood" (DaCapo, 2001). [6] “J'Accuse! Jean-Marie Messier and Edgar Bronfman Jr.
battle over anti-Semitism, anti-non-Semitism, and who's the worse
businessman”; By Daniel Gross; Posted Wednesday, Aug. 6, 2003, at 2:36 PM PT [7] If Claude Bebear Speaks, French Companies Listen
, The New York Times, November 18, 2003 Tuesday, Late Edition -
Final , Section W; Column 3; Business/Financial Desk; Pg. 1, 1797
words, By JOHN TAGLIABUE , PARIS, Nov. 14 [8] Los Angeles Times, November 16, 2003 Sunday, Home
Edition, Page 14, 4833 words, Cover Story; Fumbling the Franchise; Edgar
Bronfman Jr. Wanted to Be a Media Mogul. That Dream Cost Him Billions, as
Well as the Canadian Liquor Empire His Grandfather Built. Guess What? He
Still Wants to Be a Media Mogul., Dennis McDougal, Dennis McDougal is the
author of "The Last Mogul: Lew Wasserman,, MCA and the Hidden History of
Hollywood" (DaCapo, 2001). [9] Levin, K. 2005. The Oslo syndrome: Delusions of a
people under siege. Hanover, NH: Smith and Kraus. (pp.139-140) [9a] Some of Bronfman Sr.'s anti-Israeli
activities are documented in sections corresponding to the years 1981,
1982-83, and 1985 of the following piece: “Is the US an Ally of Israel?”;
Investigative and Historical Research; by Francisco Gil-White. [10] Parsons, Alone at the Top; AOL Time Warner Chief
Unlikely to Be Overlooked Now, The Washington Post, January 14, 2003
Tuesday, Final Edition, FINANCIAL; Pg. E01, 1140 words, Frank Ahrens,
Washington Post Staff Writer [11] PARSONS--Isabelle J. Died January 11, 2004. Beloved
wife of the late Lorenzo L. Parsons, Sr., devoted mother of five children,
Loretta Parsons Poole, Richard Parsons, Janet Parsons, Diane Parsons and the
late Lorenzo, Jr.; proud grandmother of Gregory Parsons, Leslie Parsons and
Rebecca Parsons; loving sister-in-law of Eloise, Bonnaveta, Elaine and Joan;
cherished aunt of a great host of nieces and nephews; and friend to many. She was an important part of all of their lives and
will be missed dearly. A wake will be held on Thursday, January 15th from
2-5pm and 7-9pm at the Bernard F. Dowd Funeral Home located at 165-20
Hillside Ave, Jamaica, NY. A funeral service will be held on Friday, January
16. at 10am at New Hope Lutheran Church located at 167-25 118th Ave, Jamaica,
NY. In lieu of flowers, the family requests that donations be made to the
Lorenzo and Isabelle Parsons Scholarship Fund, Community Funds, Inc., Two
Park Ave, NY, NY, 10016, in memory of the deceased. PARSONS--Isabelle J. Time Warner Inc. mourns the
passing of the beloved mother of our Chairman and CEO, Richard D. Parsons. We
extend our condolences to his entire family. Your friends and colleagues at
Time Warner. SOURCE: Paid
Notice: Deaths; PARSONS, ISABELLE J., The New York Times, January 13,
2004 Tuesday, Late Edition - Final , Section B; Column 1; Classified;
Pg. 7, 200 words [12] Farewell to a genuinely good man, The San
Francisco Chronicle, JULY 5, 2002, FRIDAY,, FINAL EDITION, NEWS;, Pg. A2;,
737 words, Rob Morse [13] Plane Crash on the White House Lawn, CNN, Larry King
Live 9:00 pm ET, September 12, 1994, Transcript # 1224, News; Domestic, 8591
words, LARRY KING; Plane Crash on the White House Lawn, CNN, Larry King
Live 9:00 pm ET, September 12, 1994, Transcript # 1224-1, News, 1839 words,
LARRY KING; Branch Davidian Verdict Ends in Acquittals, CNN, The
Week in Review 1:00 pm ET, February 27, 1994, Transcript # 99, News;
Domestic, 5934 words, SUSAN ROOK; BOB CAIN; CIA Mole Uncovered, CNN, The Week in Review 1:00 pm
ET, February 27, 1994, Transcript # 99-3, News, 800 words, SUSAN ROOK; BOB
CAIN; CNN, The Big Story 8:30 am ET, February 26, 1994,
Transcript # 83, News; Domestic, 3673 words CIA Employee and Wife Arrested for Spying for
Russia, CNN, NEWS 2:02 am ET, February 23, 1994, Transcript # 448-1, News;
Domestic, 414 words, DEBORAH POTTER Espionage Case Has Far-Reaching Implications, CNN,
NEWS 4:58 pm ET, February 23, 1994, Transcript # 653-5, News; Domestic, 560
words, SKIP LOESCHER U.S. Intelligence Assess Espionage Damage, CNN, NEWS
6:33 pm ET, February 23, 1994, Transcript # 685-6, News; Domestic, 652 words,
CHARLES BIERBAUER CNN, Crossfire 7:30 pm ET, February 23, 1994,
Transcript # 1035, News; Domestic, 4383 words Relations With Moscow Frayed Amid Espionage Charges,
CNN, Inside Politics 4:34 pm ET, February 22, 1994, Transcript # 525-1, News;
Domestic, 1314 words, WOLF BLITZER Relations With Moscow Frayed Amid Espionage Charges,
CNN, Inside Politics 4:30 pm ET, February 22, 1994, Transcript # 525,
Election; News, 3550 words, CATHERINE CRIER; BERNARD SHAW; Relations With Moscow Frayed Amid Espionage Charges,
CNN, Inside Politics 4:30 pm ET, February 22, 1994, Transcript # 525-1, News,
1315 words, CATHERINE CRIER; BERNARD SHAW; Alleged CIA Mole Arrested for Passing Secrets to
Russia, CNN, NEWS 6:03 pm ET, February 22, 1994, Transcript # 684-1, News;
Domestic, 447 words, DEBORAH POTTER [14] “BLITZER: …there is a lot of criticism leveled against
this Israeli policy. Vincent Cannistraro, a former chief of
counter-terrorism over at the CIA wrote in today's ‘Washington Post’ this.
And let me read it to you, and we'll put it up on the screen. He said: ‘As a
counter- terrorist technique, assassination is not only immoral but
ineffective in accomplishing its stated goal, the deterrence of terrorism.’” [15] Rupert Murdoch; From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. [16] Special Edition America United, Fox News Network, FOX
SPECIAL REPORT WITH BRIT HUME (18:00), September 15, 2001 Saturday,
Transcript # 091501cb.254, News; International, 5565 words, Vince
Cannistraro, Brit Hume, Wendell Goler, Greg Palkot, Carl Cameron, Rita Cosby,
David Shuster. [17] Political Headlines, Fox News Network, FOX SPECIAL
REPORT WITH BRIT HUME (18:00), October 3, 2001 Wednesday, Transcript #
100301cb.254, News; International, 2683 words, Brit Hume, Bret Baier, Jim
Angle, Carl Cameron, Brian Wilson Members Of Congress Criticize Pre-War Intelligence
On Iraq; More American Soldiers Are Killed In Iraq As Children Attend A
Renovated School; International Donors Conference Falls Short On Iraqi Aid
Funding, Fox News Network, FOX SPECIAL REPORT WITH BRIT HUME (18:00), October
24, 2003 Friday, Transcript # 102401cb.254, News; International, 2002 words,
Tony Snow, Major Garrett, Steve Harrigan, Molly Henneberg, James Rosen Interview With Saxby Chambliss, Hank Perritt,
Fox News Network, FOX HANNITY & COLMES (21:00), September 30, 2002
Monday, Transcript # 093001cb.253, News; Domestic, 2732 words, Saxby
Chambliss, Hank Perritt, Sean Hannity; Alan Colmes Interview With Laura Ingraham, David Corn, Fox News
Network, FOX HANNITY & COLMES (21:30), September 27, 2002 Friday,
Transcript # 092703cb.253, News; Domestic, 2779 words, Laura Ingraham, David
Corn, Sean Hannity, Alan Colmes Interview With David Hackworth, Fox News Network,
FOX HANNITY & COLMES (21:00), August 20, 2002 Tuesday, Transcript #
082001cb.253, News; Domestic, 1730 words, David Hackworth, Sean Hannity, Alan
Colmes [18] Interview with Veteran Intel Pros for Sanity's Ray
McGovern; Prime Minister Blair Denies Misleading Country on WMD, Fox News
Network, THE BIG STORY WITH JOHN GIBSON (17:20), June 4, 2003 Wednesday,
Transcript # 060403cb.263, News; International, 1716 words, Ray McGovern,
David Asman, Adam Boulton |
Notify me of new HIR pieces!
Notify me of new HIR pieces!
|
||||||||||
jews control
the media
jews own media
jews control
the press
jews own
press
jews control
the world
jews own the
world